ÀÖÌìÌÃfun88(ÖйúÇø)¹Ù·½ÍøÕ¾

Registration of securities issued in business combination transactions

INCOME TAXES

v3.3.1.900
INCOME TAXES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
INCOME TAXES Ìý
INCOME TAXES

Ìý

18. INCOME TAXES

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýThe following is a summary of U.S. and non-U.S. provisions for current and deferred income taxes (dollars in millions):

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Ìý

Ìý

Year ended
DecemberÌý31,

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

2015

Ìý

2014

Ìý

2013

Ìý

Income tax expense (benefit):

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

U.S.

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Current

Ìý

$

46

Ìý

$

43

Ìý

Ìý

41

Ìý

Deferred

Ìý

Ìý

21

Ìý

Ìý

(1

)

Ìý

124

Ìý

Non-U.S.

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Current

Ìý

Ìý

24

Ìý

Ìý

48

Ìý

Ìý

42

Ìý

Deferred

Ìý

Ìý

(46

)

Ìý

(47

)

Ìý

(70

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Total

Ìý

$

45

Ìý

$

43

Ìý

$

137

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýThe following schedule reconciles the differences between the U.S. federal income taxes at the U.S. statutory rate to our provision for income taxes (dollars in millions):

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Ìý

Ìý

Year ended
DecemberÌý31,

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

2015

Ìý

2014

Ìý

2013

Ìý

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

Ìý

$

176

Ìý

$

409

Ìý

$

289

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Expected tax expense at U.S. statutory rate of 35%

Ìý

$

62

Ìý

$

143

Ìý

$

101

Ìý

Change resulting from:

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

State tax expense net of federal benefit

Ìý

Ìý

(3

)

Ìý

10

Ìý

Ìý

11

Ìý

Non-U.S. tax rate differentials

Ìý

Ìý

4

Ìý

Ìý

(7

)

Ìý

10

Ìý

Effects of non-U.S. operations

Ìý

Ìý

(5

)

Ìý

4

Ìý

Ìý

3

Ìý

U.S. domestic manufacturing deduction

Ìý

Ìý

(7

)

Ìý

(13

)

Ìý

(14

)

Currency exchange gains and losses

Ìý

Ìý

(58

)

Ìý

(7

)

Ìý

14

Ìý

Effect of tax holidays

Ìý

Ìý

(6

)

Ìý

�

Ìý

Ìý

�

Ìý

U.S. foreign tax credits, net of associated income and taxes

Ìý

Ìý

(22

)

Ìý

(2

)

Ìý

(86

)

Tax benefit of losses with valuation allowances as a result of other comprehensive income

Ìý

Ìý

(3

)

Ìý

(7

)

Ìý

(22

)

Tax authority audits and dispute resolutions

Ìý

Ìý

10

Ìý

Ìý

3

Ìý

Ìý

9

Ìý

Change in valuation allowance

Ìý

Ìý

74

Ìý

Ìý

(88

)

Ìý

108

Ìý

Other, net

Ìý

Ìý

(1

)

Ìý

7

Ìý

Ìý

3

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Total income tax expense

Ìý

$

45

Ìý

$

43

Ìý

$

137

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýDuring 2013, we declared a dividend from our non-U.S. operations to the U.S., which included bringing onshore certain U.S. foreign tax credits. The foreign tax credits brought onshore significantly exceeded the amount needed to offset the cash tax impact of the dividend. A full valuation allowance was placed on the remaining foreign tax credits since it was more likely than not that the credits would expire unused due to the application of specific foreign tax credit limitations. In early 2014, the amount of foreign tax credits brought onshore was adjusted downward by $10Ìýmillion, to $104Ìýmillion, which was fully offset by a valuation allowance.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýAfter extensive research and analysis, in September 2014, we made certain elections and filed amended U.S. tax returns for tax years 2008 through 2012, along with our original U.S. tax return for tax year 2013. These new tax elections and amended tax returns allowed us to utilize U.S. foreign tax credits. The net result was $104Ìýmillion of income tax benefit recognized during 2014 for the release of the associated valuation allowance, including a discrete income tax benefit of $94Ìýmillion in the third quarter of 2014.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýDuring 2015, we declared a dividend from our non-U.S. operations to the U.S. which included bringing onshore certain U.S. foreign tax credits. The foreign tax credits brought onshore exceeded the amount needed to offset the cash tax impact of the dividend, as well as enough to allow us to carry $14Ìýmillion of foreign tax credits back to a prior year and claim a refund.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýIncluded in the non-U.S. deferred tax expense are income tax benefits of $3Ìýmillion in 2015, $7Ìýmillion in 2014 and $22Ìýmillion in 2013 for losses from continuing operations for certain jurisdictions with valuation allowances to the extent that income was recorded in other comprehensive income in that same jurisdiction. The benefits in 2015 and 2014 were largely attributable to the U.K. and the benefit in 2013 was largely attributable to Switzerland. In both years, foreign currency gains and changes in pension related items resulted in income in other comprehensive income where we have a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset. An offsetting income tax expense was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýWe operate in over 40 non-U.S. tax jurisdictions with no specific country earning a predominant amount of our off-shore earnings. The vast majority of these countries have income tax rates that are lower than the U.S. statutory rate. The average statutory rate for countries with pre-tax losses was lower than the average statutory rate for countries with pre-tax income, resulting in a net expense as compared to the U.S. statutory rate. For the year ended DecemberÌý31, 2015, the tax rate differential resulted in higher tax expense of $4Ìýmillion, reflected in the reconciliation above.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýIn certain non-U.S. tax jurisdictions, our U.S.ÌýGAAP functional currency is different than the local tax currency. As a result, foreign exchange gains and losses will impact our effective tax rate. For 2015, this resulted in a $33Ìýmillion tax benefit ($58Ìýmillion, net of $25Ìýmillion of contingent liabilities and valuation allowances). During 2015, a number of our intercompany liabilities that were denominated in U.S. dollars were owed by entities whose tax currency was the euro. As a result of the depreciation in the euro opposite the U.S. dollar, these entities recorded a tax only foreign exchange loss. Most of the intercompany receivables associated with these same U.S. dollar denominated intercompany debts were held by entities with a tax currency of the U.S. dollar which, therefore, resulted in no taxable gain.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýDuring 2015, we were granted an extension of a tax holiday from 2015 to 2022 on certain of our manufacturing operations in Singapore. During 2015, pursuant to the Singapore tax holiday, we recorded a benefit of $6Ìýmillion. We will continue to enjoy this benefit to the extent of continuing profits in this manufacturing endeavor.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýWe calculate deferred tax assets and liabilities related to U.S. state income taxes based on projected apportionment factors. During 2015, we experienced a decrease in our projected apportionment factors, which decreased our deferred tax liability for U.S. state income taxes. The amount of our deferred tax liability for U.S. state income taxes is significant, and therefore, the change in apportionment factors for 2015 decreased our net deferred tax liabilities by $5Ìýmillion. Also during 2015, we changed the legal entity location of certain of our U.S. operations. These changes had the effect of reducing our state tax expense by approximately $3Ìýmillion.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýThe components of income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were as follows (dollars in millions):

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Ìý

Ìý

Year ended
DecemberÌý31,

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

2015

Ìý

2014

Ìý

2013

Ìý

U.S.Ìý

Ìý

$

243

Ìý

$

436

Ìý

$

429

Ìý

Non-U.S.Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

(67

)

Ìý

(27

)

Ìý

(140

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Total

Ìý

$

176

Ìý

$

409

Ìý

$

289

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýComponents of deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows (dollars in millions):

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Ìý

Ìý

DecemberÌý31,

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

2014

Ìý

2014

Ìý

Deferred income tax assets:

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Net operating loss and AMT credit carryforwards

Ìý

$

871

Ìý

$

874

Ìý

Pension and other employee compensation

Ìý

Ìý

278

Ìý

Ìý

311

Ìý

Property, plant and equipment

Ìý

Ìý

103

Ìý

Ìý

118

Ìý

Intangible assets

Ìý

Ìý

131

Ìý

Ìý

46

Ìý

Foreign tax credits

Ìý

Ìý

14

Ìý

Ìý

17

Ìý

Other, net

Ìý

Ìý

100

Ìý

Ìý

100

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Total

Ìý

$

1,497

Ìý

$

1,466

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Deferred income tax liabilities:

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Property, plant and equipment

Ìý

$

(573

)

$

(535

)

Pension and other employee compensation

Ìý

Ìý

(8

)

Ìý

(2

)

Other, net

Ìý

Ìý

(128

)

Ìý

(103

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Total

Ìý

$

(709

)

$

(640

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance

Ìý

$

788

Ìý

$

826

Ìý

Valuation allowance—net operating losses and other

Ìý

Ìý

(788

)

Ìý

(707

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Net deferred tax asset

Ìý

$

�

Ìý

$

119

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Current deferred tax asset

Ìý

$

�

Ìý

$

62

Ìý

Current deferred tax liability

Ìý

Ìý

�

Ìý

Ìý

(52

)

Non-current deferred tax asset

Ìý

Ìý

418

Ìý

Ìý

435

Ìý

Non-current deferred tax liability

Ìý

Ìý

(418

)

Ìý

(326

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Net deferred tax asset

Ìý

$

�

Ìý

$

119

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýWe have gross NOLs of $3,347Ìýmillion in various non-U.S. jurisdictions. While the majority of the non-U.S. NOLs have no expiration date, $852Ìýmillion have a limited life (of which $489Ìýmillion are subject to a valuation allowance) and $29Ìýmillion are scheduled to expire in 2016 (all of which are subject to a valuation allowance). We had no NOLs expire unused in 2015.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýIncluded in the $3,347Ìýmillion of gross non-U.S. NOLs is $919Ìýmillion attributable to our Luxembourg entities. As of DecemberÌý31, 2015, due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of the benefits of these losses, there is a valuation allowance of $216Ìýmillion against these net tax-effected NOLs of $265Ìýmillion.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýWe evaluate deferred tax assets to determine whether it is more likely than not that they will be realized. Valuation allowances are reviewed each period on a tax jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis to analyze whether there is sufficient positive or negative evidence to support a change in judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax assets. These conclusions require significant judgment. In evaluating the objective evidence that historical results provide, we consider the cyclicality of businesses and cumulative income or losses during the applicable period. Cumulative losses incurred over the period limits our ability to consider other subjective evidence such as our projections for the future. Our judgments regarding valuation allowances are also influenced by the costs and risks associated with any tax planning idea.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýDuring 2015, we established valuation allowances of $35Ìýmillion and released valuation allowances of $3Ìýmillion. In the U.S., we established $14Ìýmillion of valuation allowance on U.S. foreign tax credits due to the application of specific foreign tax credit limitations, in The Netherlands we established $7Ìýmillion of valuation allowance on losses which are scheduled to expire after 2016, and in Italy we established $12Ìýmillion of valuation allowances on certain net deferred tax assets as a result of cumulative losses.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýDuring 2014, we released valuation allowances of $111Ìýmillion and established valuation allowances of $3Ìýmillion. In the U.S., we released $94Ìýmillion of valuation allowance on U.S. foreign tax credits as a result of making certain tax elections and filing amended U.S. tax returns and in Luxembourg we released a valuation allowance on $6Ìýmillion of certain net deferred tax assets as a result of significant changes in estimated future taxable income resulting from increased intercompany receivables and, therefore, increased interest income in Luxembourg, our primary treasury center outside of the U.S.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýDuring 2013, we established valuation allowances of $95Ìýmillion primarily on U.S. foreign tax credits as a result of insufficient foreign source income and we released valuation allowances on $16Ìýmillion of certain net deferred tax assets as a result of significant changes in estimated future taxable income resulting from increased intercompany receivables and, therefore, increased interest income.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýUncertainties regarding expected future income in certain jurisdictions could affect the realization of deferred tax assets in those jurisdictions and result in additional valuation allowances in future periods, or, in the case of unexpected pre-tax earnings, the release of valuation allowances in future periods.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýThe following is a summary of changes in the valuation allowance (dollars in millions):

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Ìý

Ìý

2015

Ìý

2014

Ìý

2013

Ìý

Valuation allowance as of JanuaryÌý1

Ìý

$

707

Ìý

$

832

Ìý

$

745

Ìý

Valuation allowance as of DecemberÌý31

Ìý

Ìý

788

Ìý

Ìý

707

Ìý

Ìý

832

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Net (increase) decrease

Ìý

Ìý

(81

)

Ìý

125

Ìý

Ìý

(87

)

Foreign currency movements

Ìý

Ìý

(22

)

Ìý

(49

)

Ìý

16

Ìý

(Decrease) increase to deferred tax assets with no impact on operating tax expense, including an offsetting (decrease) increase to valuation allowances

Ìý

Ìý

29

Ìý

Ìý

12

Ìý

Ìý

(37

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Change in valuation allowance per rate reconciliation

Ìý

$

(74

)

$

88

Ìý

$

(108

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Components of change in valuation allowance affecting tax expense:

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

Pre-tax losses in jurisdictions with valuation allowances resulting in no tax expense or benefit

Ìý

$

(41

)

$

(31

)

$

(18

)

Releases of valuation allowances in various jurisdictions

Ìý

Ìý

3

Ìý

Ìý

122

Ìý

Ìý

16

Ìý

Establishments of valuation allowances in various jurisdictions

Ìý

Ìý

(36

)

Ìý

(3

)

Ìý

(106

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Change in valuation allowance per rate reconciliation

Ìý

$

(74

)

$

88

Ìý

$

(108

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýThe following is a reconciliation of our unrecognized tax benefits (dollars in millions):

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Ìý

Ìý

2015

Ìý

2014

Ìý

Unrecognized tax benefits as of JanuaryÌý1

Ìý

$

68

Ìý

$

96

Ìý

Gross increases and decreases—tax positions taken during a prior period

Ìý

Ìý

3

Ìý

Ìý

(18

)

Gross increases and decreases—tax positions taken during the current period

Ìý

Ìý

5

Ìý

Ìý

1

Ìý

Decreases related to settlements of amounts due to tax authorities

Ìý

Ìý

(2

)

Ìý

(5

)

Reductions resulting from the lapse of statutes of limitation

Ìý

Ìý

(8

)

Ìý

(2

)

Foreign currency movements

Ìý

Ìý

(4

)

Ìý

(4

)

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

Unrecognized tax benefits as of DecemberÌý31

Ìý

$

62

Ìý

$

68

Ìý

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

�

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

â€� Ìý

â€� Ìý

�

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýAs of DecemberÌý31, 2015 and 2014, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $50Ìýmillion and $36Ìýmillion, respectively.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýDuring 2015, 2014, and 2013, for unrecognized tax benefits that impact tax expense, we recorded a net increase in unrecognized tax benefits with a corresponding income tax expense (not including interest and penalty expense) of $19Ìýmillion, $1Ìýmillion and $8Ìýmillion, respectively. Additional decreases in unrecognized tax benefits were offset by cash settlements or by a decrease in net deferred tax assets and, therefore, did not affect income tax expense.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýIn accordance with our accounting policy, we continue to recognize interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Ìý

Ìý

Year ended DecemberÌý31,

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

2015

Ìý

2014

Ìý

2013

Ìý

Interest expense included in tax expense

Ìý

$

(9

)

$

2

Ìý

$

2

Ìý

Penalties expense included in tax expense

Ìý

Ìý

�

Ìý

Ìý

�

Ìý

Ìý

(1

)

Ìý

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Ìý

Ìý

DecemberÌý31,

Ìý

Ìý

Ìý

2015

Ìý

2014

Ìý

Accrued liability for interest

Ìý

$

4Ìý

Ìý

$

14Ìý

Ìý

Accrued liability for penalties

Ìý

Ìý

�

Ìý

Ìý

�

Ìý

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýWe conduct business globally and, as a result, we file income tax returns in U.S. federal, various U.S. state and various non-U.S. jurisdictions. The following table summarizes the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions:

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý

Tax Jurisdiction

Ìý

Open Tax Years

China

Ìý

2011 and later

France

Ìý

2002 and later

India

Ìý

2004 and later

Italy

Ìý

2010 and later

Malaysia

Ìý

2003 and later

Switzerland

Ìý

2009 and later

The Netherlands

Ìý

2010 and later

United Kingdom

Ìý

2012 and later

United States federal

Ìý

2009 and later

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýCertain of our U.S. and non-U.S. income tax returns are currently under various stages of audit by applicable tax authorities and the amounts ultimately agreed upon in resolution of the issues raised may differ materially from the amounts accrued.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýWe estimate that it is reasonably possible that certain of our non-U.S. unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12Ìýmonths of the reporting date with a resulting decrease in the unrecognized tax benefits within a reasonably possible range of $4Ìýmillion to $24Ìýmillion. For the 12-month period from the reporting date, we would expect that a substantial portion of the decrease in our unrecognized tax benefits would result in a corresponding benefit to our income tax expense.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýDuring 2015, we concluded and effectively settled tax examinations in the U.S. (both federal and various states) and various non-U.S. jurisdictions including, but not limited to China and France. During 2014, we concluded and settled tax examinations in the U.S. (both federal and various states) and various non-U.S. jurisdictions including, but not limited to, China, France and Spain. During 2013, we concluded and settled tax examinations in the U.S. (both federal and various states) and various non-U.S. jurisdictions including, but not limited to, China, France and Italy.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýFor non-U.S. entities that were not treated as branches for U.S. tax purposes, we do not provide for income taxes on the undistributed earnings of these subsidiaries that are reinvested and, in the opinion of management, will continue to be reinvested indefinitely. We have material intercompany debt obligations owed by our non-U.S. subsidiaries to the U.S. We do not intend to repatriate earnings to the U.S. via dividend based on estimates of future domestic cash generation and our ability to return cash to the U.S. through payments of intercompany debt owned by our non-U.S. subsidiaries to the U.S. To the extent that cash is required in the U.S., rather than repatriate earnings to the U.S. via dividend, we expect to utilize our intercompany debt. If any earnings were repatriated via dividend, we may need to accrue and pay taxes on the distributions.

ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýAs discussed, we made a distribution of a portion of our earnings in 2015 and 2013 when the amount of foreign tax credits associated with the distribution was greater than the amount of tax otherwise due. The undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries with positive earnings that are deemed to be permanently invested were approximately $354Ìýmillion at DecemberÌý31, 2015. It is not practicable to determine the unrecognized deferred tax liability on those earnings because of the significant assumptions necessary to compute the tax.